Description
Persuasive speech on the topic of Stem Cell research for SPK 201. 7:37
25 Responses to “Stem Cell Research – Persuasive Speech – Daniel Sauble”
Leave a Reply
- Obama To Lift Stem Cell Ban
- Heart Failure Patient After Adult Stem Cell Therapy
- Stem Cells
- Dr. Oz to Oprah and Michael J Fox: “The stem cell debate is dead.”
- New heart built with stem cells
- Sight restored within weeks with ADULT Stem Cell contacts!
- Stem-cell work thrown into limbo.
- Brian Williams Resveratrol Report
- Stem-cell decision is no threat to federal science funding.
- cnn – stem cells research progress
- Mike Ortega – Stemulation- Chief Marketing Officer -Part-1_H264_Widescreen_320×180.mov
- For the first time, researchers identify and isolate adult mammary stem cells in mice
-
WayCurious: Fox supports brain tumors, apparently. Don't his ...
-
-
-
-
-
lips and eyebrows…. LOL
Was this for practice?
GIVE ME UR SPEECH!
This isn’t a real answer.
lol u are pwned ^_^
lol, is it bad that this is what I’m doing for my persuasive speech? I just found this too ! D:
why not just rebuild your own body parts again inside your own body using your own adult stem cells the natural way ,the technology to do that is available only now check it out for yourself go now to w w w . vitalityunlimited . stemtechbiz . com
Great speech !
are you retarded? You suck at speech giving.
wait what? the sentences don’t make sense.
well if you want to get into politics and shit an embryo is not an american… you have to be born in america for that to happen. so it does not have the rights of an american therefore it doesnt matter where life begins. its not an american yet so who gives a damn.. he dont care about your opinion tprice108 so shut the fuck up!!!
You have a slight lisp. fix it.
That’s just one book though, there are others that state something to the effect of, the life of a new human being starts. If you want I can find that one when I have some spare time.
Though I think it’s not necessary. They are human beings that’s an undeniable fact.
Are they alive?
Well if they were dead the woman would have a miscarriage now wouldn’t she? If they were dead they would not continue to develop and grow without interference. Yet they do.
It’s just common sense.
wtf!!!!!!!
ok djsauble.
below, that is not a fact from the book but merely a quote. That is the basis for the controversy: nobody knows exactly where life begins thus the arguement. “human development” is in my opinion another way of saying ‘life’….just my opinion.
Very well said. I have only one thing to correct, human embryos are not arguabley the foundation or start of life, they are in fact the start or foundation of human life.
Just one word. I presume you are also against abortion. If so I suggest reading a little of Essential of Human Embryology.
A fact, quoted from that book:
“Human development begins after the union of male and female gametes or germ cells during a process known as fertilization (conception).”
To clarify, I believe that every human life is equally valuable, but in an infinite sense, not a discrete sense. I can no more say that 10 human lives is more valuable than a single human life than I can say that ten times infinity is greater than infinity.
Unfortunately, this was an either-or decision. We have to make these decisions from time to time in our life (ie. you’re a vegetarian OR not; you’re a Christian OR not) and there are no in-betweens.
If the child was in a back room trapped and if the tray of embryo’s was in another room in a fire this would be plausible.
With your reasoning, if the “value of human life is the same regardless of age” then you would save the embryos b/c there are 10 of them.
Just trying to understand you.
I believe that the value of human life is the same regardless of age or development. Thus, this question is impossible for me to answer.
Put another way, if a fire broke out in a high-rise apartment, and I could save the life of a 3-year old or an 80-year old, which would I choose? Frankly, the only morally correct action would be to try and save both. There is no alternative.
djsauble question to you: “The embryo is a human” (your quote)
Hypothetical situation: suppose a fire were to break out at a fertility clinic and you had the chance to save a 3 year old child or a tray of 10 embryos; who would you save?
screw ethics if it cures something then we should use embryotic stem cells
I got cancer, THANK YOU STEM CELLS!!!!
However a downside to adult stem cells is that it actually has a limited amount of repairs it may heal. This happens due to how adult cells have only been found in tissues and few are in these. These tissues are called the “stem cell niche”. This has an limited amount however, scientists are still finding how they may farm and grow more adult stem cells
We will probably soon be able to make somatic (or adult) stem cells into pluripotens stem cells. Those cells under the right conditions will have the ability to become a human, just as embryonic stem cells do. So every cell in your body is actually a potential human being, just like an embryonic stem cell. So what is the difference between destroying an empryonic stem cell and a somatic cell? Whenever you scrath yourself its a genocide if you follow this guys logic.
Amazing job, I’m doing this topic for my public speaking class! Well done, you did your research.